domingo, 31 de mayo de 2020

Antisemitas y Antisionistas en una marcha contra la Cuarentena

Itongadol/Agencia AJN.  “Todos los políticos son masones y son sionistas. Soros, Rothschild, Rockefeller, los Warburg, el sionismo maneja el mundo”, fue uno de los tantos comentarios que incitaron al odio en una manifestación contra las medidas para prevenir la propagación del coronavirus.

Agencia AJN.- Un grupo de manifestantes, que marchó ayer en la ciudad de Buenos Aires para protestar contra las medidas de prevención del coronavirus, lanzó una serie expresiones antisemitas y antisionistas, con teorías conspirativas sobre los judíos que “manejan el mundo”.

“La gente tiene que despertar, tenemos que despertar de toda esta mentira. Todos los medios de comunicación trabajan para los mismos poderosos que manejan el mundo. Todos los políticos son masones y son sionistas. Soros, Rothschild, Rockefeller, los Warburg, el sionismo maneja el mundo”, afirmó un hombre que estaba en contra de la cuarentena, en diálogo con un periodista de C5N.

“Más del 60 por ciento son medios judíos. Las bancas internacionales pertenecen a los judíos”, agregó una mujer que se manifestaba en frente del Obelisco porteño.

Además, algunos sostenían carteles que decían “Yo voté a Alberto, no a Soros”. George Soros es un magnate e inversor financiero húngaro de origen judío, que en el último tiempo ha sido blanco de los antisemitas que propagan discursos de odio.

En respuesta a estas manifestaciones, la DAIA expresó a través de Twitter: “Otra vez expresiones irresponsables de la supuesta conspiración sionista de los medios de comunicación en plena pandemia. Voces incitando al odio antisemita, en una manifestación de repudio a la cuarentena en el Obelisco, ante la pasividad del periodista”.

“Seguimos indignados por la incitación a la violencia. Les iniciaremos las acciones legales correspondientes, están visiblemente identificados”, concluyó la institución judía.

viernes, 27 de marzo de 2020

La crítica del Centro Wiesenthal al Vaticano por un cuadro "grotesco"

Centro Wiesenthal al Vaticano: "El cuadro del Libelo de Sangre socava la condena del Papa Francisco contra el antisemitismo".

El martirio de San Simon de Trento por libelo de sangre
Giovanni Gasparro

 “A dos semanas de la Pascua Judía y la Pascua de Resurreción reaparecen imágenes de una antigua parodia que muestra imagénes de judíos extrayendo sangre a un niño cristiano para hornear la matzá… ¡El libelo de sangre continúa sangrando!", advierten desde el Centro Wiesenthal.

En una carta al Cardenal Pietro Parolin, Secretario de Estado del Vaticano,  el Dr. Shimon Samuels, Director de Relaciones Internacionales del Centro Simon Wiesenthal, expresó su conmoción ante una pintura recientemente publicada por Giovanni Gasparro. Este artista italiano que se ve a sí mismo como un católico devoto, aparentemente rechaza los principios del Concilio Vaticano II y Nostra Aetate.

La carta explicaba que “la nueva pintura de Gasparro representa el 'Martirio di San Simonino da Trento por Omicidio Rituale Ebraico' ('Martirio de San Simón de Trento por homicidio judío ritual'), que no es más que la repetición de un libelo de sangre de 1475 que representa a judíos en imágenes antisemitas , 'celebrando' la sangría de un niño cristiano para hornear el pan de Pascua ”.

Las horribles imágenes del libelo de sangre, tal como lo representa Giuseppe Gasparro hoy y en una ilustración de finales del siglo XV.


Martirio de San Simon


El Centro recordó que, “en aquellos tiempos, el libelo de sangre no sólo derivó en la tortura y ejecución de la comunidad judía local, sino que sus imágenes provocaron un aumento generalizado de la violencia antisemita en toda Europa. La representación de hoy del libelo de sangre por parte de Gasparro es aún más gráfica y seguramente se difundirá a través de las redes sociales ”.

Samuels argumentó que “la fecha de puesta en circulación de la pintura fue el 24 de marzo, tradicional 'Día de San Simonino',  la que iba a ser seguida de una conferencia programada para el 3 de abril, ahora pospuesta debido a la pandemia, sobre 'La invención del culpable y la ocultación de los inocentes.  El caso de San Simonino de Trento, orador: Don Francesco Ricossa, quien se dedica a difundir el libelo de sangre ”.

Este sitio web  abre con una plegaria: "Dios, restaurador de la inocencia, por cuyo nombre el bendito Simonino fue asesinado con una muy dura muerte por los pérfidos judíos ..."

La carta continuó:  "Su Eminencia, es muy inquietante que estos festivales y conferencias se celebren anualmente próximos a la Pascua Judía y la Pascua de Resurrección... El Concilio Vaticano II actuó para prohibir la veneración de Simón de Trento, con la intención de combatir el antisemitismo en la Iglesia.  Nostra Aetate también inició una largamente buscada relación sanadora entre la Cristiandad y el Judaísmo ".

El Centro agregó:   "Como saben, el 20 de enero, el Centro Wiesenthal se reunió en audiencia con el Santo Padre,  Papa Francisco, quien hizo una apasionada declaración condenando el antisemitismo".

"El trabajo de Gasparro  es  aparentemente bienvenido en las iglesias italianas, pero esta pintura claramente fomenta la búsqueda de chivos expiatorios en un clima recurrente de noticias falsas, socavando así la política del Vaticano, y debería recibir una condena pública directa ... Agradeceríamos la intervención de Su Eminencia ya que el libelo de sangre continúa sangrando!”  concluyó Samuels.

© EL PERFIL.com

miércoles, 8 de mayo de 2019

Chile seeks to extradite NZ farmer Zach Ward for allegedly killing over 1500 calves

By John Anthony

A New Zealand dairy farmer faces possible extradition to Chile for allegedly brutally killing more than 1500 calves while working in the South American country.

Leyla Chahin Valenzuela, deputy prosecutor in Puerto Montt, said Zachary Reuben Ward was wanted for alleged crimes relating to the mistreatment of animals. A notice filed by Valenzuela with the Court of Appeal of Valdivia says "urgency is implicit" in getting New Zealand authorities to hand Ward over because he was considered a flight risk. She wants Ward held in custody in Chile before standing trial in Valdivia.


 
Ward left Chile in 2014 following the emergence of a video allegedly showing him slaughtering calves using a hammer, and by injecting air into them. The video, which emerged in 2014, was aired in New Zealand at the time, and Ward was named by TVNZ as the man clubbing a bobby calf to death. The video was taken on a farm in Chile owned by New Zealand company Manuka. A month before the video appeared Chilean authorities launched an investigation into Manuka for alleged animal abuse in killing 6000 calves unusable in the milk production process.

Manuka's head office is in Chile and in 2014 it owned 22,500 hectares in Chile with farms in Los Lagos and Los Ríos. Manuka director Steve Smith said Ward left the company in 2014. Ward is now the chief executive of New Zealand dairy company Canterbury Grasslands. The company has dairy farms in Canterbury, Southland and Missouri, United States. Ward has been approved for comment.

When Stuff phoned Grasslands' Canterbury office a man said the company's chairman and director Mark Townshend was the best person to comment. He would not provide contact details for Townshend. Townshend, who is a director of Manuka and a former Fonterra director, told media in 2014 he had sympathy for Ward because there was no vet available to give the animals the lethal injection required under Chile's rules.

Prominent New Zealand businessmen, former Fonterra chairman, Sir Henry van der Heyden is chairman of Manuka and personally holds a small shareholding in Grasslands. He is also a director and shareholder of Pascaro Investments, which owns 31 per cent of Grasslands, making it the company's biggest shareholder. Fonterra director Brent Goldsack is also a director of Grasslands as is former MediaWorks and NZX chief executive Mark Weldon. Van der Heyden, who is also Rabobank chairman, spoke at an Institute of Directors event in Hamilton in 2015 about his experience joining Manuka during the bobby calf issue.

The event synopsis said the animal welfare issue "threatened to undermine shareholder value".

 "Sir Henry will discuss how the board confronted and managed this issue, the responsibilities and risks a director needs to consider in a crisis, his views on how a board can best manage these events, and the learnings from this particular incident."

Bobby calf treatment has been the subject of debate in New Zealand in recent years, particularly in light of a 2015 animal abuse case which centered around a Te Kauwhata pet food company's treatment of bobby calves.

 Graphic footage emerged of bobby calves being picked up at farms and thrown on trucks, as well as being kicked and bludgeoned, and then being clubbed to death at an abattoir.

 Down Cow owner Alan Martyn Cleaver was sentenced to six months' community detention, 180 hours of community work and fined $ 90,000.

 In 2017 the number of bobby calves sent to slaughter fell, which some in the industry said was the result of farmers seeking to adopt more humane practices.


https://i.stuff.co.nz

domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018

«Genocida» y «pedófilo»: Colón, enemigo público número uno del revisionismo

Por Javier Ansorena


Una de las estrellas de la programación de comedia de este mes del superpoderoso Netflix en EE.UU. es «Latin History for Morons» (en español, «Historia latina para idiotas»). Es un espectáculo teatral escrito, dirigido y protagonizado por el actor John Leguizamo, que estuvo en las tablas de Broadway el invierno pasado y consiguió una nominación al Tony a la mejor obra del año. Una de estas actuaciones se grabó para un especial de la plataforma de vídeo digital.



Leguizamo es neoyorquino de origen puertorriqueño y colombiano. Su obra, a pesar del humor innegable, es una vuelta de tuerca más al revisionismo, la descontextualización, el complejo y el buenismo del discurso dominante en parte de la sociedad estadounidense sobre la colonización española y los abusos sobre la población indígena. En el relato de Leguizamo, los españoles son «comemierdas, lameculos, hijueputas» que «saquearon y violaron» en el «mayor robo de la historia». El enemigo favorito de Leguizamo es Cristóbal Colón. No ahorra los epítetos para el navegante que conectó a Europa y América: «violador genocida pedófilo», responsable del «Holocausto caribeño» y «el Donald Trump del Nuevo Mundo».




El Columbus Day

El especial de Netflix se ha estrenado el mismo mes en el que Los Ángeles decidía quitar una estatua de Colón de uno de los parques de la ciudad. Todo, pocas semanas después de que muchas ciudades y condados de EE.UU. suprimieran Columbus Day, un festivo en todo el país desde principios del siglo XX en coincidencia con el 12 de octubre, y lo reemplazaran por el Día de los Pueblos Indígenas. En EE.UU., el revisionismo histórico es una tendencia en alza en organizaciones indigenistas, en el discurso de la corrección política del progresismo estadounidense y hasta en el mundo del entretenimiento


«Colón fue responsable de atrocidades y sus acciones pusieron en marcha el mayor genocidio de la historia conocida. Su imagen no debería celebrarse en ningún sitio», aseguró Mitch O’Farrell, el concejal de Los Ángeles que impulsó la eliminación de la estatua, con un discurso desmentido por buena parte de la historiografía. Buena parte de la universidad estadounidense está también dominada por este mensaje. Una fecha clave fue la publicación en 1980 de «Una historia del pueblo de EE.UU», de Howard Zinn –Leguizamo lo muestra al público desde el escenario como un texto revelado–, que reduce la colonización al exterminio de los indígenas. «Es un libro que saca relatos históricos fuera de contexto y que ha calado en nuestra universidad», critica James McCusker, presidente de la Asociación Nacional de Cristóbal Colón de EE.UU. «Ese discurso se ha propagado en los departamentos de historia y se ha trasmitido a los estudiantes y a quienes enseñan».


Fray Junípero Serra

Este mismo año, la universidad de Stanford, una de las más prestigiosas del país, decidió eliminar el nombre de Fray Juníspero Serra, el franciscano que en el siglo XVIII articuló el sistema de misiones que dio lugar a la actual California, de calles y edificios del campus. Entre las razones que esgrimió la comisión nombrada por el rector para decidir sobre el asunto está «el dolor, el trauma, el daño emocional y el perjuicio a la salud mental» que los estudiantes y profesores nativos americanos –algunos tan alejados de California como Canadá o Hawaii– sufren al encontrarse con una calle dedicada a Serra, al que el Papa Francisco canonizó en 2015, entre otras razones, «por defender la dignidad de la comunidad nativa y protegerla de aquellos que la maltrataron y abusaron».



Es imposible encontrar una única razón para explicar el porqué de esta corriente en EE.UU. «Los blancos, si son decentes y si admiten la realidad de la historia del país, sienten la culpa de la esclavitud de los negros y del exterminio de los nativos. Es lógico que intenten expresar y compensar esa vergüenza», asegura Felipe Fernández-Armesto, profesor en la Universidad de Notre Dame y una eminencia en la figura de Colón y en las contribuciones hispanas a la formación de EE.UU. En su opinión, Colón es un chivo expiatorio perfecto «por ser extranjero, por supuesto». Su figura buscó ser apropiada por todos: italianos, judíos y hasta escoceses, pero cada vez se le asocia menos con la formación de EE.UU.

«Se puede purgar la culpa histórica de las injusticias imperiales regañando a Colón, sin el inconveniente de admitir los excesos de los compatriotas y familiares, que fueron los auténticos autores de genocidios y esclavitudes». «Se toman los valores de hoy en día y se trata de juzgar con su luz a los héroes del pasado», critica McCusker, que ve como principal problema «la falta de conocimiento histórico» cuando se juzga a personajes como Colón. «Es ante todo ignorancia», insiste en esa línea el periodista y profesor universitario Miguel Pérez, de la Universidad de la Ciudad de Nueva York, de origen cubano y dedicado a enseñar el papel indiscutible de los hispanos en la creación y configuración de EE.UU.

¿Qué intereses hay detrás de este fenómeno, quién lo promueve? «Se trata más bien de la falta de voces en contra», responde Fernández-Armesto. «Stanford es una universidad sometida a valores comerciales: responde a la demanda del mercado; los municipios que derrumban estatuas siguen otro tipo de negocio: el de acumular votos». «Pero también hay una intención de hacer desaparecer las contribuciones hispanas a ello», apunta Miguel Pérez sobre el revisionismo. Leguizamo lamenta en varios pasajes de su espectáculo la inexistencia de héroes latinos, su ausencia en los libros de texto que estudia su hijo, el borrado de un pueblo desde la caída del imperio azteca hasta nuestros días. En su particular cacao histórico, denigra a Hernán Cortés Francisco Pizarro, y ensalza a Simón Bolívar; cita de pasada como héroe a Bernardo de Gálvez, una figura decisiva en la revolución estadounidense, pero no menciona que era el gobernador español en Luisiana.

Para Pérez, Leguizamo y los hispanos que aplauden cuando se derriba una estatua no son conscientes de que su discurso solo contribuye a enterrar todavía más una identidad –la lengua compartida, la cultura, la gastronomía– y una historia –tan heroica y violenta como cualquier otra– todavía muy poco celebrada y reconocida en EE.UU.


Tras Los Ángeles, ataque en La Paz

El presidente de Bolivia, Evo Morales, se apresuró esta semana a celebrar la retirada de la estatua de Colón en Los Ángeles. «Saludamos al hermano concejal de Los Ángeles, Mitch O’Farrell, descendiente de la tribu Wyandotte de Oklahoma», dijo en un mensaje en Twitter. «Coincidimos con él en que el llamado Descubrimiento fue un genocidio y un saqueo de recursos naturales», añadió. Dos días después, la estatua de Colón en el Paseo del Prado, una de las arterias principales de la capital boliviana, fue víctima del vandalismo. El monumento apareció con manchas de pintura roja y negra y con carteles en los que se leía «Colón genocida», «Nos mataron», «Fue invasión» o «Saquen a Colón». La alcaldía de La Paz aseguró que se limpiaría el monumento, pero añadió que sufrió el ataque «por ser considerado el colonizador y opresor de los habitantes de América».

ABC.es
Copyright © DIARIO ABC, S.L

miércoles, 31 de enero de 2018

Norway Olympic ski team under fire for sweater’s symbol used by Nazi Germany

By Katie Dangerfield
National Online Journalist,
Breaking News
Global News


The black and grey sweaters feature a symbol known as the Tyr rune, representing the team’s theme for the Olympics, “the Attacking Viking.” The symbol is associated with Viking and Norse mythology and stands for heroic glory.




But the symbol has also been hijacked by extreme right-wing groups. For example, Tyr was also the official emblem for Adolf Hitler’s leadership school in Nazi Germany.

Since the Second World War, neo-Nazis and other white supremacists continued to use the Tyr symbol — its popularity in part stems from the fact that it is considered by many to be the “warrior rune,” according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

Norway’s security police have warned of the rise of a small but politically extreme and potentially violent neo-Nazo group called the Nordic Resistance Movement, which uses the Tyr rune in its branding, according to the New York Times.

Company will not remove sweaters
Despite the controversy, the manufacturer of the sweater, Dale of Norway, is continuing to sell the sweater. It is being sold for C$279 on the company’s website, and is described as a “Viking concept” with bold patterns that includes “runic symbols for victory and protection.”

Hilde Midthjell, Dale of Norway’s CEO, told the New York Times, she is frustrated and disappointed over the situation and has “vowed to face down any attempts by white supremacists to co-opt symbols that belonged to a shared Norwegian heritage.”
“Neo-Nazis have marched with Norwegian flags,” she said. “That does not mean we stop using that, does it?”

The design is still the downhill ski team’s official sweater for the 2017-2018 season. But several members of the Alpine team told the New York Times they will no longer be wearing the sweater during the games in South Korea.

martes, 9 de enero de 2018

Muere Salvador Borrego, revisionista histórico de habla hispana

Ayer día 8 fallecía a los 102 años de edad, el escritor y periodista mejicano Salvador Borrego Escalante.

Fue director de 37 periódicos y fundador de varios de ellos. Publicó 50 libros de diversa temática como historia militar, política, economía, sociología, periodismo, filosofía y religión.

Borrego sería constantemente acusado de presunto antisemitismo debido a sus críticas a la ideología judía internacional, a quien señalaba como causante de la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

Junto al español Joaquín Bochaca, fue considerado hasta su muerte como uno de los máximos representantes del revisionismo histórico de habla hispana.
J. Garrido

miércoles, 20 de diciembre de 2017

Oskar Groening: Former Nazi SS guard at Auschwitz appeals against sentence 'because prison would violate his right to life'

Jon Sharman.






A man dubbed the “book-keeper of Auschwitz“ is appealing his prison sentence for complicity in the murders of 300,000 people at the camp because, his lawyers argue, jail time would violate his right to life.

Oskar Groening, 96, has challenged a 29 November court ruling that said he was fit to go to prison as his special needs could be accommodated there.

The physically frail Groening was sentenced to four years in 2015 in one of the last cases against a surviving Nazi, but has not been incarcerated since then because of a legal argument about his health.

German media quoted Groening’s lawyer, Hans Holtermann, as saying that the latest legal challenge asked Germany’s constitutional court to determine if imprisonment would violate Groening’s right to life, given his medical condition.

He told broadcaster N-TV an expert had concluded Groening was not fit enough to be imprisoned.

Groening, a former Nazi SS officer, did not kill anyone himself while working at the camp in Nazi-occupied Poland. But a court convicted him in 2015 of aiding and abetting mass murder there through various actions, including by sorting banknotes seized from arriving Jews.

He admitted during his trial that he was morally guilty and said he had been an enthusiastic Nazi when he was sent to work at Auschwitz in 1942 at the age of 21.





Some six million Jews were murdered during the Holocaust carried out under Adolf Hitler.

During Groening’s trial, Auschwitz prisoner Kathleen Zahavi told how her “happy childhood” was shattered when her family were kidnapped and her mother and aunt were executed

They were “treated worse than animals” at the death camp in occupied Poland, she said, telling a visibly distressed Groening how “I hope the images of what went on there will stay with you for the rest of your days”.

 THE INDEPENDENT

viernes, 17 de agosto de 2012

Ecuador claims moral high ground in Julian Assange case

Dan Collyns in Quito

The decision of Rafael Correa, Ecuador's charismatic and often hot-tempered leader, to grant political asylum to Julian Assange has gone down well with his supporters, who see their small country taking the moral high ground. But for his critics, the move is typically provocative and damaging to the country's international standing.



Rosana Alvarado, a national assembly representative of Correa's Alianza Pais party, was at the forefront of 50-strong crowd of protesters who gathered near the office block housing the British embassy in Quito.

Alvarado said Ecuadoreans were people who had learned to survive and assert their sovereignty in an "upright and decent way". She said Ecuador wanted to protect Julian Assange, who had "taken on the big powers, the huge empires and economic interests to defend freedom of speech".

"We don't defend impunity," she added but stressed that Swedish officials turned down the opportunity to interview Assange at the Ecuadorean embassy in London.

"The coincidences are very strange," she said of the allegations of sexual assault faced by Assange in Sweden. "I don't believe it could be an accident that a scandal of this kind surged when he was taking on the big powers for having revealed sensitive information."

It was a small but noisy protest. Chants ranged from "colonialism go home" to stronger expressions such as "England: colonial son of a bitch", which rhymes in Spanish.

"This set-up trial [in Sweden] is just a farce so they can deliver Julian Assange to the United States and apply the death penalty," said Rosario San Roman, a journalist.

Despite his support for Assange's whistleblowing, Correa has had a troubled relationship with the Ecuadorean press. In February, Carlos Pérez, editor of the main opposition newspaper, El Universo, was granted 14 days asylum in Panama's embassy in Quito after the country's high court upheld a conviction of criminal defamation against him and other senior editors following a highly critical editorial column. Correa later pardoned them and waived a $42m damages award.

"There was no safe passage for Pérez when he sought asylum in the Panamanian embassy," said Ramiro Crespo, director of Analytica, a Quito-based thinktank. "There's a contradiction between the way [Correa] has treated Assange and his lack of respect for journalists and the political opposition at home. It would be nice if he didn't insult them and accuse them of corruption every Saturday." President Correa has a weekly programme on the state-owned channel.

Crespo described the asylum move as a "distraction" to draw attention away from Correa's domestic problems including legal security, the centralisation of executive power and freedom of expression. "Right now Ecuador is not a real democratic republic where there is a proper separation of powers."

He added that, in granting asylum to Assange, Correa had reinforced his "anti-Americanism and assertion of Ecuador's sovereignty" which went down well domestically, although it would probably have little impact on his already high popularity. Opinion polls show Correa has a 70% approval rating, largely due to his huge social spending in the poor nation of 14 million people. General elections are set for January 2013 and Correa is expected to win.

theguardian

viernes, 3 de agosto de 2012

La remera alemana Nadja Drygalla abandona la Villa Olímpica por lazos con la extrema derecha



LONDRES, 3 (EP/Reuters)

La remera alemana Nadja Drygalla ha abandonado por voluntad propia la Villa Olímpica esta madrugada después de que la televisión pública alemana (ARD) informase de la pertenencia de su pareja a grupos de extrema derecha, según ha informado el Comité Olímpico Alemán (DOSB).



"Drygalla -integrante del equipo a ocho alemán- manifestó su compromiso con la Carta Olímpica. Ha abandonado la Villa Olímpica para no ser una carga para el equipo", declaró el presidente del DOSB, Michael Vesper, que no ofreció las razones de su abandono, que aseguran que son de "ámbito privado". Drygalla y el director deportivo de la Federación Alemana de Remo, Mario Woldt, mantuvieron una reunión en la que finalmente se decidió el abandono.

La ARD aseguró esta misma semana que Drygalla, de 23 años y ex policía, tenía una relación con un miembro de los 'Rostock National Socialists', cercano al ultraderechista Partido Nacionaldemócrata de Alemania (NPD). Por esta razón, Drygalla ya abandonó hace unos meses el Cuerpo Nacional de Policía.

domingo, 1 de julio de 2012

Jews DO control the media

We Jews are a funny breed. We love to brag about every Jewish actor. Sometimes we even pretend an actor is Jewish just because we like him enough that we think he deserves to be on our team. We brag about Jewish authors, Jewish politicians, Jewish directors. Every time someone mentions any movie or book or piece of art, we inevitably say something like, “Did you know that he was Jewish?” That’s just how we roll.
We’re a driven group, and not just in regards to the art world. We have, for example, AIPAC, which  was essentially constructed just to drive agenda in Washington DC. And it succeeds admirably. And we brag about it. Again, it’s just what we do.

But the funny part is when any anti-Semite or anti-Israel person starts to spout stuff like, “The Jews control the media!” and “The Jews control Washington!”

Suddenly we’re up in arms. We create huge campaigns to take these people down. We do what we can to put them out of work. We publish articles. We’ve created entire organizations that exist just to tell everyone that the Jews don’t control nothin’. No, we don’t control the media, we don’t have any more sway in DC than anyone else. No, no, no, we swear: We’re just like everybody else!

Does anyone else (who’s not a bigot) see the irony of this?

Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media. We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show, whether it be “Tropic Thunder” or “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews?



Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty good. (photo credit: CC BY-SA Angela George/Wikimedia Commons)

 Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty good. (photo credit: CC BY-SA Angela George/Wikimedia Commons)



But that’s not all. We also control the ads that go on those TV shows.

And let’s not forget AIPAC, every anti-Semite’s favorite punching bag. We’re talking an organization that’s practically the equivalent of the Elders of Zion. I’ll never forget when I was involved in Israeli advocacy in college and being at one of the many AIPAC conventions. A man literally stood in front of us and told us that their whole goal was to only work with top-50 school graduate students because they would eventually be the people making changes in the government. Here I am, an idealistic little kid that goes to a bottom 50 school (ASU) who wants to do some grassroots advocacy, and these guys are literally talking about infiltrating the government. Intense.

Now, I know what everyone will say. That everyone tries to lobby. Every minority group and every majority group. That every group has some successful actors and directors. But that’s a far call from saying that we run Hollywood and Madison Avenue. That the Mel Gibsons of the world are right in saying we’re deliberately using our power to take over the world. That we’ve got some crazy conspiracy going down.

Okay. Fine. So some of that is kooky talk.
But let’s look at it a bit deeper.

Maybe it’s true: everyone lobbies. Maybe it’s true there are actors of every ethnicity out there. But come on. We’re the ones who are bragging about this stuff all the time. Can’t we admit that we’re incredibly successful? Can’t we say it to the world?

I’ll give my theory for why Jews don’t want to talk about their control of the media.

First of all, as much as Jews like to admit that so many of them are successful, and that so many of them have accomplished so much, they hate to admit that it has to do with they’re being Jewish. Maybe they’ll admit that it has something to do with the Jewish experience. But how many Jews will admit that there is something inherently a part of every single one of them that helps them to accomplish amazing things?

The ADL chairman, Abe Foxman, was interviewed in a great article about the subject and he said that he “would prefer people say that many executives in the industry ‘happen to be Jewish.’” This just about sums up the party line.

The truth is, the anti-Semites got it right. We Jews have something planted in each one of us that makes us completely different from every group in the world. We’re talking about a group of people that just got put in death camps, endured pogroms, their whole families decimated. And then they came to America, the one place that ever really let them have as much power as they wanted, and suddenly they’re taking over. Please don’t tell me that any other group in the world has ever done that. Only the Jews. And we’ve done it before. That’s why the Jews were enslaved in Egypt. We were too successful. Go look at the Torah — it’s right there. And we did it in Germany too.

This ability to succeed, this inner drive, comes not from the years of education or any other sort of conditional factors, but because of the inner spark within each Jew.

Now, the reason groups like the ADL and AIPAC hate admitting this is because, first of all, they are secular organizations. Their whole agenda is to prove that every Jew is the same as every other person in the world. I cannot imagine a more outlandish agenda. No, we’re different. We’re special.



And clearly, that whole thing about big Jewish noses was totally blown out of proportion. (illustrative photo: Abir Sultan/Flash 90)

And clearly, that whole thing about big Jewish noses was totally blown out of proportion. (illustrative photo: Abir Sultan/Flash 90)



Of course, people hate when anyone says this. They assume that if you’re saying that Jews are special, it somehow implies that they’re better.

To be honest, I’m not really sure what the word “better” even means. What I do know is that being special simply means a person has a responsibility to do good.
I think that’s the real reason most Jews are so afraid to admit that there’s something inherently powerful and good about them. Not because they’re afraid of being special. But because they’re afraid of being responsible. It means that they’re suddenly culpable when they create dirty TV shows that sully the spiritual atmosphere of the world. It means that things can’t just be created for the sake of amusement or fun or even “art.”

Suddenly, we can’t screw up the world.

The interesting thing is that Jews have done so much for the world in so many other ways. They’ve moved forward civil rights; they’ve helped save lives in Darfur, Haiti and just about everywhere else.

But that’s not enough. Fixing the world physically is only half the battle.

Our larger battle, the harder battle, is elevating the world spiritually. And this is what the people that fight with every inch of their soul to prove that Jews are just the same as everyone else are afraid of. It means that we can no longer just “express ourselves.” We’ll have to start thinking about the things we create and the way we act. It means we’ll have to start working together. It means we’ll have to hold one other, and ourselves, to a higher standard.

The time has come, though. We no longer have to change our names. We no longer have to blend in like chameleons. We own a whole freaking country.

Instead, we can be proud of who we are, and simultaneously aware of our huge responsibility — and opportunity.


THE TIMES OF ISRAEL