jueves, 29 de marzo de 2012

Retiran tumba de padres de Hitler por convertirse en santuario de neonazis

Alois y Klara Hitler, estaban sepultados en en el cementerio católico de la localidad de Leonding, al suroeste de Austria.


La tumba de los padres de Adolf Hitler, que se encontraba al suroeste de Austria, en la localidad de Leondig, fue desmantelada por ser considerada un lugar de peregrinación de neonazis.

Según informó este jueves el párroco responsable de la sepultura un pariente lejano de la familia aprobó la medida, consigna Dpa.

Al parecer, la tumba era visitada por simpatizantes de la extrema derecha. Según los pobladores, había días en que llegaban buses de neonazis al lugar. En 2009 incluso fue colgado un gran cartel que decía "120", en memoria de los 120 años desde el nacimiento de Hitler.

La última vez que se hallaron indicios de una visita semejante fue en noviembre del año pasado, cuando ante la lápida apareció un florero que decía "No fueron olvidados" y contenía además el símbolo nazi de la SS.

Hitler nació en 1889 en la localidad de Brunau, p ero vivió durante su infancia también en la cercana ciudad alemana de Passau y a partir de 1899 en Leonding. Sus padres, Alois y Klara Hitler, murieron en 1903 y 1907 respectivamente.

El párroco de Leonding, Kurt Pittertschatscher, confirmó hoy a la agencia de noticias austríaca APA que la lápida ya ha sido retirada y que la tumba puede ser usada ahora por otra persona, apuntó Efe. 



LA TERCERA

miércoles, 28 de marzo de 2012

Shai Agosin denunció lobby político contra "Ley Antidiscriminación"


El presidente de la Comunidad Judía den Chile, Shai Agosin, denunció la existencia de un lobby “feroz” que se ha opuesto a la tramitación de la Ley contra la Discriminación, que busca sancionar los ataques a las minorías sexuales, religiosas y étnicas en el país.
Al referirse a la muerte de Daniel Zamudio, en el programa “Mentiras Verdaderas” de La Red, el ex rostro del Club Disney tuvo palabras muy duras para quienes, según afirmó, han tergiversado el objetivo del proyecto de ley presentado durante el gobierno de Ricardo Lagos.
“Me indigna mucho este lobby feroz que hay porque no salga la ley antidiscriminación. Me indigna mucho que salga gente miope que trata de una forma u otra de no darle la oportunidad al resto de los chilenos”, señaló Agosin en el espacio.
Consultado sobre quienes forman parte de ese grupo que presiona para que la ley no sea aprobada o salga disminuida, el representante judío fue categórico: “Tenemos gente de la extrema derecha de nuestro país, tenemos una Ena von Baer, tenemos a un (Juan Antonio) Coloma y compañía”, dijo, acusando directamente a esos políticos.
“Y no solamente se trata de votar en contra, se trata de confundir a la opinión pública, se trata de meter falacia y de hacer de alguna forma de hacer creer a la gente que vamos a perder nuestras libertades. Es realmente burdo”, sostuvo.
“Esta ley existe en muchos países más”, agregó, señalando que por lo demás el proyecto que se encuentra en el Congreso ha sido mutilado y no es la mejor legislación que se puede tener.
Por eso, resaltó que también es importante que se apruebe otro proyecto que busca castigar la “incitación al odio”, el cual también está entrampado en el Parlamento.
Nación.cl

lunes, 26 de marzo de 2012

Were Jews ever really slaves in Egypt, or is Passover a myth?

Where is the real proof - archeological evidence, state records and primary sources? 

By Josh Mintz / Jewish World blogger 

Here's a question for you: what do actor Charlton Heston, DreamWorks animation studios and Former Prime Minister Menachem Begin all have in common? Well, they've all, at one time or another, perpetuated the myth that the Jews built the pyramids. And it is a myth, make no mistake. Even if we take the earliest possible date for Jewish slavery that the Bible suggests, the Jews were enslaved in Egypt a good three hundred years after the 1750 B.C. completion date of the pyramids. That is, of course, if they were ever slaves in Egypt at all. 

We are so quick to point out the obvious lies about Jews and Israel that come out in Egypt – the Sinai Governors claims that the Mossad released a shark into the Red Sea to kill Egyptians, or, as I once read in a newspaper whilst on holiday in Cairo, the tale of the magnetic belt buckles that Jews were selling cheap in Egypt that would sterilize men on contact – yet we so rarely examine our own misconceptions about the nature of our history with the Egyptian nation. 

We tend, in the midst of our disdain for Egyptian, anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, to overlook the fact that one of the biggest events of the Jewish calendar is predicated upon reminding the next generation every year of how the Egyptians were our cruel slave-masters, in a bondage that likely never happened. Is this really so different from Jaws the Mossad agent? 

The reality is that there is no evidence whatsoever that the Jews were ever enslaved in Egypt. Yes, there's the story contained within the bible itself, but that's not a remotely historically admissible source. I'm talking about real proof; archeological evidence, state records and primary sources. Of these, nothing exists. 

It is hard to believe that 600,000 families (which would mean about two million people) crossed the entire Sinai without leaving one shard of pottery (the archeologist's best friend) with Hebrew writing on it. It is remarkable that Egyptian records make no mention of the sudden migration of what would have been nearly a quarter of their population, nor has any evidence been found for any of the expected effects of such an exodus; such as economic downturn or labor shortages. Furthermore, there is no evidence in Israel that shows a sudden influx of people from another culture at that time. No rapid departure from traditional pottery has been seen, no record or story of a surge in population. 

In fact, there's absolutely no more evidence to suggest that the story is true than there is in support of any of the Arab world's conspiracy theories and tall tales about Jews. 

So, as we come to Passover 2012 when, thanks to the “Arab Spring,” our relations with Egypt are at a nearly 40 year low, let us enjoy our Seder and read the story by all means, but also remind those at the table who may forget that it is just a metaphor, and that there is no ancient animosity between Israelites and Egyptians. Because, if we want to re-establish that elusive peace with Egypt that so many worked so hard to build, we're all going to have to let go of our prejudices. 

HAARETZ.com

jueves, 22 de marzo de 2012

Sarkozy anuncia medidas para evitar difusión de ideologías extremistas



Se castigará a quienes consulten sitios en Internet que hagan apología del terrorismo.

El presidente francés, Nicolas Sarkozy, anunció este jueves una reforma legislativa para imponer penas a todos los que consulten sitios Internet que hagan apología del terrorismo o la violencia o a los que viajen al extranjero para adoctrinarse en ese tipo de ideologías. 


"Se reprimirá la propagación de ideologías extremistas con un delito en el Código Penal", subrayó Sarkozy en una declaración desde el Eliseo sobre la operación policial que terminó con la vida del asesino confeso de siete personas en Toulouse y Montauban en los últimos días. 
El jefe del Estado defendió esa intervención en la que "se ha hecho todo lo posible para que respondiera ante la justicia el asesino, pero no se podía concebir exponer vidas con ese objetivo: ya ha habido demasiadas muertes", añadió en alusión a las circunstancias de la muerte de Mohamed Merah. 
Según el relato del ministro del Interior, Claude Guéant, Merah respondió con fuego a discreción al asalto del cuerpo de elite de la policía RAID -dos de cuyos agentes resultaron heridos-, y saltó disparando por la ventana del piso en el que llevaba atrincherado más de 32 horas bajo el cerco de las fuerzas del orden. 
El presidente indicó que "hay una investigación en marcha para determinar si tuvo complicidades" en el asesinato de tres niños y un profesor en una escuela judía de Toulouse y de tres militares, uno en esa misma ciudad y otros dos en la vecina Montauban. 
"Francia ha demostrado sangre fría y determinación", se ha mantenido "unida", destacó antes de pedir a la población que se supere la indignación y subrayar que "los musulmanes no tienen nada que ver con las motivaciones locas de un terrorista". 
Y para ilustrarlo, recordó que antes de matar a los niños judíos, el asesino había disparado contra militares musulmanes. 
En cualquier caso, precisó que con la reforma que piensa llevar adelante, "cualquier persona que consulte de forma habitual sitios Internet que hagan apología del terrorismo o apelen al odio y a la violencia será castigado penalmente". 
Además, "cualquier persona que vaya al extranjero para adoctrinarse con ideologías que conduzcan al terrorismo será castigado penalmente", apostilló. 
Sarkozy dijo que había encargado a su ministro de Justicia "una reflexión en profundidad" sobre la propagación en las cárceles de ideologías "de odio y de terrorismo". 
"La unidad debe ser nuestro objetivo, la firmeza nuestro medio al servicio de los valores de nuestra República", concluyó.
EFE

sábado, 17 de marzo de 2012

Report into Rudolf Hess death fails to answer unexplained questions about Nazi prisoner's 'suicide'

By 

It has been 25 years since leading Nazi Rudolf Hess died in a Berlin prison but a newly-declassified report into how it happened has apparently failed to answer unexplained questions about whether he really did kill himself.



The publication of what is said to be a suicide note written “a few minutes before my death” by Hitler’s former deputy appears to add weight to claims that it had actually been penned nearly 20 years before when he was seriously ill.

Photographs of the “summer house” in the ground of Spandau Prison where the 93-year-old died – and the electrical cord he was said to have used to take his own life – seem to deepen the mystery even further. Conspiracy theories have long suggested that he was murdered and the evidence covered up amid fears he was on the brink of being released – and might disclose embarrassing secrets about his time in British captivity.

His son Wolf Hess has claimed that the UK, US and France - who had long said they were prepared to consent to his release were it not for a Soviet veto - feared a new mood of openness in Gorbachev’s Kremlin would call their bluff. He also claimed that the contents of the “suicide” note actually refer to a period in 1969 when he had a perforated ulcer in the duodenum and feared he could die. 

One historian says the official text of the note in the report by the Royal Military Police’s Special Investigation Branch lends weight to the allegation. Sceptics claim clues in the note suggest it refers to events 20 years earlier.

At that time Hess was concerned to express his regrets over his behaviour towards his one-time private secretary “Freiberg”, during the Nuremberg trials when he said: “I had to act as though I didn’t know her.”
The note was also said by his son to have used a sign-off “Euer Grohser”, or “your eldest”, that he had not used for about 20 years.

Peter Padfield, an historian who persuaded the Ministry of Defence to release the documents under Freedom of Information law, said: “The ‘suicide note’ in German appended to the report is surely bogus from the content. “For instance, passing his regrets to Freiberg – he had done this some twenty years before when his wife and son visited him for the first time in Spandau. “And by contrast there is no mention in the note of his grandchildren.”

The report also states that Hess killed himself using an electrical extension cable fastened to a rear window handle just 1.4m from the floor. His son noted in 1992: “Hess was a frail 93-year-old man with no strength left in his hands, who could just barely drag himself from his cell into the garden. “How was he supposed to have killed himself in this way? Did he hang himself with the cord from a hook or a window latch? Or did he throttle himself?”

The report states that no marks or “material of evidential value to suggest criminal involvement” was found at the scene. But it adds: “Because of free access to the summer house by all concerned with the prisoner, the lifting of latent finger impressions was not considered practical.”

Hess was jailed for life in 1946 after being convicted of war crimes at Nuremberg. The circumstances of his detainment at Allied hands are perhaps even more mysterious than those of his death.

Formerly Hitler’s loyal deputy, he took it upon himself to fly a plane to Scotland in 1941, apparently in an attempt to secure peace – parachuting from his Messerschmitt and being arrested by a farmer with a pitchfork. One theory mooted last year suggested that he had been the victim of an elaborate MI6 sting, when he was persuaded that members of the Royal Family were willing to broker a peace deal with the Nazis. He died in Berlin’s Spandau Prison on Aug 17, 1987. The report on his death was originally filed between August 25, 1987 and January 1988.

The Telegraph

jueves, 8 de marzo de 2012

Tribunal alemán prohíbe publicar extractos de "Mi lucha" en semanario sobre el nazismo

El Ministerio de Finanzas de Baviera logró vetar hasto el año 2015 la exposición pública del texto escrito por Hitler.

 

BERLÍN.- La Audiencia de Münich prohibió hoy la publicación de pasajes del libro "Mi lucha" de Adolf Hitler en una edición comentada y en formato de fascículo coleccionable en el semanario histórico sobre el nazismo "Zeitungszeugen" (Periódicos testimoniales).

La justicia muniquesa respondió así a la demanda presentada por el Ministerio de Finanzas de Baviera, a cuya tutela están los derechos de autor de la obra de Hitler, contra la edición preparada por el editor británico Peter McGee, quien vio suspendida ya su publicación en enero pasado por un procedimiento de urgencia.

La intención del editor era poner a la venta fragmentos de la obra, comentada por historiadores de prestigio, como suplemento de la revista "Zeitungszeugen", una edición facsímil de diarios nazis que viene publicando desde 2009.

Tras la prohibición provisional de urgencia en enero, el propio editor publicó el primer fascículo con los fragmentos del "Mi lucha", pero ilegibles -es decir, con el texto desenfocado-, a modo de solución de compromiso y hasta que se resolviera el litigio con las autoridades bávaras.

El Ministerio de Finanzas de Baviera presentó su demanda con el argumento de que la publicación vulnera las leyes de propiedad intelectual del libro.

Baviera tiene hasta 2015 -70 años después de la muerte de Hitler- los derechos exclusivos de publicación del libro "Mi lucha".

McGee quiso poner a la venta esos cuadernillos, con una tirada inicial de 100 mil ejemplares, en formato revista de 15 páginas, y en forma de serie coleccionable.

Hasta ahora, Baviera ha vetado la publicación de la obra con el argumento de que los derechos le fueron trasferidos en 1945 por las autoridades aliadas con el mandato de impedir la difusión de todo aquello susceptible de convertirse en propaganda nazi.

El editor argumentó que su propósito es desenmascarar "Mi lucha" como un libro extremadamente malo, para destruir el mito alrededor del manifiesto ideológico de Hitler.

La edición facsímil de "Zeitungszeugen", como la de los fragmentos del "Mi lucha", forma parte de un proyecto de investigación sobre el nazismo, argumentó McGee.

A partir de 2015, cuando expiren los derechos de autor del libro, espera poder publicar "Mi lucha" en su integridad, en edición preparada por reputados historiadores alemanes como Hans Mommsen y Sönke Neitzel.

"Mi lucha" fue escrito por Hitler en la cárcel en 1924, nueve años antes de su llegada al poder en 1933, y en él sentaba las bases de su ideología nacionalsocialista y fervientemente antisemita.

El libro está prohibido en Alemania, pero -como la propia comunidad judía ha reconocido- mantener el veto es ya algo ilusorio, puesto que cualquiera puede conseguirlo a través de Internet.




emol.com

lunes, 5 de marzo de 2012

Barack Obama tells Israel conference: 'too much loose talk of war'


Barack Obama has admonished Israel for "too much loose talk of war" with Iran and said the world has a responsibility to give sanctions an opportunity to discourage Tehran from pursuing a nuclear weapon.



Speaking before a meeting on Monday with the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, Obama sought to head off pressure for him to commit to military action against Tehran if it crosses specified "red lines" in its nuclear programme.

The president told a sceptical audience at the annual conference of America's most influential pro-Israel lobby group that he accepts a "basic truth" that no Israeli government can tolerate Iran developing a nuclear weapon, and that he therefore understands the "profound historical obligation" weighing on the shoulders of Israel's leaders.

Obama said explicitly that he is prepared to use force against Iran to defend US interests if necessary, but he chastised those who appear to be in a hurry for war in comments apparently aimed at Israeli officials who have been making belligerent noises.

"I would ask that we all remember the weightiness of these issues; the stakes involved for Israel, for America, and for the world. Already, there is too much loose talk of war," he told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac). "Over the last few weeks, such talk has only benefited the Iranian government, by driving up the price of oil, which they depend upon to fund their nuclear programme. For the sake of Israel's security, America's security, and the peace and security of the world, now is not the time for bluster; now is the time to let our increased pressure sink in, and to sustain the broad international coalition that we have built.

" Now is the time to heed that timeless advice from Teddy Roosevelt: speak softly, but carry a big stick."

Obama pleased Aipac delegates by saying he would not pursue a policy of "containment" of a nuclear-armed Iran – a commitment Aipac has been pressing through support of resolutions in Congress. He also said that he "will take no option off the table" and that includes "a military effort to be prepared for any contingency".

"I will not hesitate to use force when it is necessary to defend the United States and its interests," he said.

But Netanyahu wants Obama to go further and commit to the use of force if Iran crosses agreed "red lines" in the development of its nuclear programme.

In his response to the speech, Netanyahu said he appreciated Obama's reiteration that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons: "Perhaps most important of all, I appreciated the fact that he said that Israel must be able to defend itself, by itself, against any threat."

But the Israeli leader also set the stage for what is likely to be a difficult meeting with Obama by saying that he will go his own way if he finds it necessary.

Netanyahu warned on Friday that the international community should not fall into the "trap" of negotiating while Iran continues its "relentless pursuit of nuclear weapons". He said that the international community should demand the immediate dismantling of Iran's underground nuclear facility in Qom and a halt to uranium enrichment.

Israel's president, Shimon Peres, pressed the point when he told the conference on Sunday that Iran was an evil and corrupt regime and "an affront to human dignity".

"It must be stopped, and it will be stopped," he said. "If we are forced to fight, trust me, we shall prevail."

US officials have made clear the president will not set the "red lines" wanted by Netanyahu out of concern it will be interpreted by the Israelis as a tacit endorsement of an attack if Iran fails to meet demands. Obama is instead expected to repeat in private to Netanyahu what he has said in public – that there is time for sanctions and diplomacy to work.

"I firmly believe that an opportunity remains for diplomacy – backed by pressure – to succeed. The United States and Israel both assess that Iran does not yet have a nuclear weapon, and we are exceedingly vigilant in monitoring their programme. Now, the international community has a responsibility to use the time and space that exists," he said to virtual silence from the Aipac delegates. "Iran's leaders still have the opportunity to make the right decision. They can choose a path that brings them back into the community of nations, or they can continue down a dead end.

"Given their history, there are of course no guarantees that the Iranian regime will make the right choice. But both Israel and the United States have an interest in seeing this challenge resolved diplomatically. After all, the only way to truly solve this problem is for the Iranian government to make a decision to forsake nuclear weapons. That's what history tells us."

Obama went on to say that the experience of sending Americans to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan had left him in no hurry for a war in Iran.

"As president and commander-in-chief, I have a deeply-held preference for peace over war. I have sent men and women into harm's way," he said. "For this reason, as part of my solemn obligation to the American people, I will only use force when the time and circumstances demand it. And I know that Israeli leaders also know all too well the costs and consequences of war, even as they recognise their obligation to defend their country."

Like every other president of recent times, Obama restated to Aipac the "unbreakable bonds" between the US and Israel and his own commitment to the Jewish state. But he sounded unusually defensive in the face of Republican accusations that he is endangering Israel's security with his Iran policy and that he has been "anti-Israel" by pressing Netanyahu to take peace negotiations with the Palestinians seriously, beginning with a halt to continued construction of Jewish settlements in the occupied territories.

"As you examine my commitment, you don't just have to count on my words. You can look at my deeds. Because over the last three years, as president of the United States, I have kept my commitments to the state of Israel. At every crucial juncture, at every fork in the road‚ we have been there for Israel. Every single time," he said.

theguardian

jueves, 1 de marzo de 2012

US congressional nominee: Holocaust ‘blackest lie’ in history


A US Republican congressional hopeful has emphasized that “Holocaust never happened” and that such an event amounts to “the blackest lie in history.”







Arthur Jones, who hopes to challenge Democrat Dan Lipinski in Illinois' 3rd Congressional District, noted that the claim of killing millions of Jews and other people by Nazis during the World War II “is nothing more than an international extortion racket by the Jews,” Hoffington Post reported.

“It’s the blackest lie in history. Millions of dollars are being made by Jews telling this tale of woe and misfortune in books, movies, plays and TV,” he said

"The more survivors, the more lies that are told," the 64-year-old candidate said.

Jones said he hopes to win the Republican primary nomination and move on to challenge Democrat Dan Lipinski next November.

He also questioned Lipinski’s strange affiliation with powerful pro-Israeli lobby group in the US-- American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Jones underlined that the pro-Israeli lobby “was bragging on their website” on how Lipinski is “spearheading an effort in the [US] House of Representatives with a Jewish Congressman from Virginia named Frank Wolf to get tough with Iran, including closing off any oil exports to China that could lead to World War III.”

Jones, a Vietnam War veteran, also compared current conditions in the US to the situation in Germany following the end of World War I and insisted that “our country is falling apart economically, politically, culturally, militarily.”

“We are going down,” he noted angrily.

“These war-mongering fools in congress like [Republican presidential candidates] Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney -- we can’t let Iran have one nuclear weapon but we let Israel have all the nuclear weapons they want,” Jones said. “This is ridiculous.”

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called on a number of occasions for a historical examination of ‘the Holocaust’ in an effort to uncover realities of the much publicized World War II event. His remarks, however, have sparked outrage among pro-Israeli Western powers, labeling him as a “holocaust denier.”

DB/MB/MA

PRESSTV

martes, 7 de febrero de 2012

Only Whites are Racist in Duluth


Jaenelle Antas



The city of Duluth, Minnesota is running an “Un-Fair Campaign”, implying that all White people and only White people are racist. The campaign includes billboards that say things like “It’s hard to see racism when you’re White” and photos of White faces written on in black marker about our inherent “White privilege”—all the advantages Whites get from being White but aren’t even aware of. Like the one below:



The stated mission of the Un-Fair campaign is to:
… raise awareness about white privilege in our community, provide resources for understanding and action, and facilitate dialogue and partnership that results in fundamental, systemic change towards racial justice.
This campaign’s partners include the University of Minnesota, the University of Wisconsin-Lake Superior College (all overflowing with over “enlightened” ivory tower liberals), the NAACP (who are constantly agitating for Black privilege), the YWCA (their mission is to eliminate racism and empower women), Community Action Duluth (whose work with low-income people seems premised on the belief that White privilege is keeping people down), and the Clayton Jackson McGhie Memorial (dedicated to the memory of three Blacks who were lynched in Duluth 80 years ago; their mission is fighting ‘institutional racism’). It gets an official stamp of approval from the City of Duluth and the mayor, Don Ness.
Duluth is, after all, a predominantly White city and the liberal establishment wants us to believe this is a problem. The Un-Fair Campaign states on their website:
The population of Duluth is 89% white, which may be a factor in our community appearing and functioning as a monoculture. This causes some groups to feel marginalized and excluded.
This outcome was confirmed in a recent report on a three year study, Soul of the Community, commissioned by the Knight Foundation, which stated:
The [Duluth Area] community significantly underperforms against the comparison group overall and in four of the seven individual openness measures. … Fewer residents than in other comparable communities say it is a good place for racial and ethnic minorities, immigrants, young adults without children, and talented college graduates looking for work.
However, no one is running an anti-racism campaign in Detroit, which is 85% Black, where the racism that has made non-Blacks feel so unwelcome that they have left the city en masse. By 1940, Detroit was 90% White, but the influx of ‘diversity’ and the crime and urban decay that came with it drove away pretty much all the Whites who could afford to leave. Today Detroit is one of the least livable cities in America.
Duluth, by contrast is clean and safe (it doesn’t even have a ‘Crime’ section on its Wikipedia entry), with good schools and good jobs. This “racist” city has managed to provide a much higher standard of living compared to other, more diverse cities, including for those residents who are supposedly discriminated against in some invisible fashion. This is probably why there has never been a mass exodus of non-Whites from Duluth. The living there is pretty good all around.
In one television news program (below), a black girl in Duluth is shown saying that the Un-Fair campaign is a good thing because maybe it will result in more opportunities and jobs for Blacks.


Detroit, which is run by blacks and where racism presumably can’t exist due to the lack of white people, has roughly a 20% unemployment rate. Duluth’s unemployment rate is just under 6%, which means that the vast majority of Blacks there who want jobs can get them. Nor is there any shortage of good schools in Duluth. Every black child there is going to get a much better education than they would in Detroit, which opens up opportunities to them that Blacks in other cities could never dream of.
As someone who grew up in Minnesota and has since traveled all around America and the rest of the globe, I can say with certainty that Minnesotans are among the least racist and most tolerant people there are, hands down. White people everywhere tend to bend over backwards so as not to come across as racist, but nowhere is this truer than in Minnesota where the concept of Minnesota Nice is a reality and the inhabitants outside of the Twin Cities haven’t had enough exposure to other races to have any reason to be hostile to them.
The Un-Fair Campaign is inventing a problem that doesn’t exist. In saying they want to have a conversation about race, what they really mean is that they want White people to admit they are racist and apologise for it until they are blue in the face. Whites aren’t allowed to argue the point of whether or not they are privileged because they are told they can’t see it anyway. (Convenient circular logic there.) Non-Whites are not encouraged or expected to take responsibility for their own behaviour, but rather to blame any and all misfortunes on White folk and to interpret every negative experience they have through the lens of discrimination. This isn’t a conversation. It is a scripted dialogue and there is no colour-blind casting—only Whites can play the villain, only non-Whites can play the victim.
The only racism whites have difficulty seeing is the racism directed at them. Whites bow down willingly to this kind of rhetoric, blindly accepting their guilt for the crime of having been born. Whites make excuses for racially motivated anti-White crime, refusing to call it what it is. Whites allow themselves to be brainwashed into believing they have no culture, no tribe, no identity beyond that of the individual.
Indeed, I would venture to say that Whites in general are the least racially aware people on the planet. No thinking Black, Hispanic, or Asian believes that race is only a “social construct,” and they agitate aggressively on behalf of their own people. They speak in terms such as “the black community” or “the Latino community.” They don’t claim to be colourblind. In fact, they see race everywhere they look, are acutely aware of it, and eager to point it out. I doubt the majority of Whites in Duluth think about race much at all or have any real experience with racial issues. That just simply isn’t a part of life in areas that are 90%+ White.
The Un-Fair Campaign is certainly unfair. It’s not about combating racism. I doubt much exists in Duluth, of all places. It’s about furthering the idea of inherent White guilt and creating division within a community as a publicity stunt. Non-whites in Duluth wouldn’t feel as though they were being victimised if they weren’t constantly being told that they are. In any situation, it’s always important to ask who stands to gain. The people of Duluth don’t stand to benefit from this. All the Un-Fair Campaign will do is create hostility and resentment that didn’t exist before. The elite, however, always benefit when the lesser classes are divided and distracted and spreading accusations of racism is a convenient way to do this.

Occidental Observer

lunes, 6 de febrero de 2012

Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok



A group of Russian scientists in Antarctica has succeeded in drilling to a lake buried two miles beneath the icy landmass, the state-run Russian news service Ria Novosti reported -- following a week of radio silence from the team that had some scratching their heads.



“Yesterday, our scientists stopped drilling at the depth of 3,768 meters and reached the surface of the sub-glacial lake,” the source reportedly said in a story posted Monday, Feb. 6. An unnamed source with Russia's Federal Service for Hydrometeorology confirmed the news as well, Russian business newspaper The View reported.

John Priscu, a microbiologist with Montana State University who has worked on a similar Antarctic exploration program, hopes Vostok and other subglacial lakes buried beneath the continent may offer a glimpse of extreme new forms of life. "If they were successful, their efforts will transform the way we do science in Antarctica and provide us with an entirely new view of what exists under the vast Antarctic ice sheet," he told FoxNews.com.

The team from Russia's Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) had been drilling for weeks in an effort to reach isolated Lake Vostok, a vast, dark body of water hidden 13,000 ft. below the ice sheet's surface. The lake hasn't been exposed to air in more than 20 million years. Russia has not yet officially confirmed the breakthrough.

Beyond the fantastic science, Ria Novosti noted a number of rumors about the lake, including one that talks of a secret Nazi sub base, and the bodies of Hitler and his mistress being delivered there for cloning -- fantastic stories that again are surfacing in the Russian press.



A brief break in communication with colleagues in the unfrozen world had some asking questions about the scientists, as Antarctica’s killing winter draws near. But despite the lack of info and onset of winter, which brings temperatures as low as -80 F or colder, the team was never in danger, Priscu said. "They are very capable scientists and drillers and the thought never entered my mind that they are in any kind of danger," he told FoxNews.com. The buried lake may be similar to the conditions on Mars and Jupiter’s moon Europa, Ria Novosti said.

The Lake Vostok project has been years in the making, with initial drilling at the massive lake -- 6,060 square miles (15,690 square kilometers) -- starting in 1998. The scientists were quickly able to reach 11,800 feet (3,600 meters), but had to stop due to concerns of possible contamination of the never-before-touched lake water. The scientists came up with a clever way to make sure the water would not be contaminated: They agreed to drill until a sensor warned them of free water. At that point they took out the kerosene and adjusted the pressure so that none of the liquids would fall into the lake, but rather lake water would rise through the hole due to pressure from below.



The Russians are not alone in such a mission: Scientists from around the world are literally racing to explore the mysteries of Antarctica. There are two other Antarctic digs underway.

A team from the British Antarctic Survey is on a competing mission, set to plumb the depths of Lake Ellsworth, one of a string of more than 370 lakes beneath Antarctica that may soon see light for the first time. And a third Antarctic expedition -- a study of the subglacial Whillans Ice Stream -- mainly features U.S. scientists.

FoxNews.com